Communication Case Studies

Communication Case Studies

Please Note: All case studies are intended to be generic so that substitutions can be made, according to your own clinical roles. For example, if a case study mentions a patient with a medical condition, you can substitute the disease cancer, so that it would be appropriate for oncology nurses, or visa-versa. You may also insert APRN for nurse practitioners, clinical nurse specialists, etc. In addition, hospice/palliative care nurses can review each case study, as though they were consulting on each of these case studies. Feel free to adjust the case studies so they are relevant to your participant’s clinical practice/needs.

Module 6
Case Study #1
Mr. Jones: Breaking Bad News to Family

You have received a hospice referral for Mr. Jones, age 54, who has ALS (amyotrophic lateral sclerosis). He and his family (wife and 3 children-ages 9,16, 19), who are confused and anxious, listen to you as you describe what they should expect from the hospice experience. The family does not seem to understand why you are discussing end-of-life issues with them. You call Mr. Jones’ family physician who tells you that the patient assured him that he talked to his family about his prognosis. You determine that Mr. Jones has in fact not told his family. You talk with Mr. Jones who admits that he has told his family he is very stable and expected to have many years of life remaining. He asks you to help him break the reality of his poor prognosis to his family.
Discussion Questions:
1. What is your role now?
2. What communication gaps do you recognize?
3. What strategies would promote continuity of care and improve team communication?
4. How might a family meeting be helpful in this case?
5. What special needs would you perceive the children having at this time? How would you meet these needs?

Module 6
Case Study #2
Cindy: Disagreement

Cindy is a 36-year old female with pancreatic cancer has been hospitalized for two weeks. She has been in the intensive care unit for the past 5 days. Her physical deterioration and suffering had created anguish in her husband and in the health care team. The attending physician discussed with the husband the likelihood of his wife having a cardiac and/or respiratory arrest, described the actions the team would take for a full resuscitation as well as the varying levels of resuscitation approved by the treatment setting, which included a do-not-resuscitate option, and asked the husband to express his preferences regarding resuscitation. The husband initially chose the do-not-resuscitate status for his wife and completed all of official paperwork to implement that decision. During the next 12 hours, the husband actively solicited from nursing and medical staff their definitions of do-not-resuscitate. He then contacted the attending physician to rescind his decision, choosing instead to have a full resuscitation order in place. He explained his decision change as, “When I saw that the nurses and doctors did not all define resuscitation in the same way, I decided that I would not leave that in their hands. I am my wife’s husband and I will be her husband to the end.” This new decision was enacted and over the next four days, the patient showed clear signs of dying. Her husband stayed with her in the intensive care unit and witnessed the changes in his wife’s physical appearance. He began commenting on those changes and on his wife’s obvious suffering. Within two hours of her death, the husband told the nurse that he did not want his wife to be resuscitated. This information was immediately conveyed to the health care team and a brief discussion with the physician, husband, and nurse was convened to affirm this decision.
Discussion Questions:
1. What were the barriers to effective communication in this case?
2. How might these barriers have been eliminated?

Module 6
Case Study #3
Max: Communicating Sudden Death
(This case study could be changed to a patient with cancer for oncology nurses)
Max Klein is an 84-year-old retired plumber who has brought his 83-year-old wife, Mary, to the E.R. complaining of chest pain. Mary’s condition declines, she experiences cardiac arrest and full resuscitation is attempted. During this time Max communicates to the social worker and chaplain that “This just can’t be. Mary is healthy as an ox.” He doesn’t want to notify his children who live out of town “until she’s stable because I know they’ll get her straightened out – they’re really good here at Methodist Hospital.” Max seems anxious but distracted and talks incessantly about how Mary’s been sick before but “always gets better before you know it.” After 2 hours of numerous procedures and attempts, Mary dies.
Discussion Questions:
1. What are useful communication strategies while Mary is still receiving aggressive care to communicate her status?

2. How should Max be told of Mary’s death?

3. What is the role of the interdisciplinary team in communication in this case?

Module 6
Case Study #4
Mr. Quartera Has A Question

Valenzio Quartera is a 56-year-old man with widely metastatic prostate cancer. He is currently undergoing radiation therapy for bone metastasis. His wife died one year ago from breast cancer. He currently lives at home with his twin daughters, age 15 years. As you, the radiation oncology nurse, enter the treatment room, Mr. Quartera asks you, “Susie, you don’t think I’m going to die do you?” “What would happen to my daughters if I die?”

Discussion Questions:

1. How would you respond?

2. How would you address his concern about his daughters?

3. What would you recommend that he discuss with his daughters at this time?

4. What other members of the healthcare team would be appropriate to contact to help Mr. Quartera with his daughters?

Module 6
Case Study #5
Mr. Ahmed: Active Treatment and Palliative Care?

Mr. Ahmed is a 49-year-old with a recurrent brain tumor currently hospitalized after experiencing seizures. Mr. Ahmed was diagnosed at age 44 and has had extensive surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy. Three months ago, his oncology team advised him and his family that there were no further treatment options and recommended palliative care. The family was not interested in palliative care, they requested that “everything be done.” He has experienced weight loss, increasing severe headaches, nausea and now seizures. Following a severe seizure last week, his wife brought him back to the cancer center seeking possible new treatments and wonders if he can receive palliative care, too. As Mr. Ahmed waits in radiology for a scan, you, the oncology nurse, come to see him as you heard he was in radiology. He tells you he is so tired of treatment and being taken far away and just wishes his family would “give up and just let me be at home so I can play with my dog and be with my friends.”

Discussion Questions:

1. How would you respond to Mr. Ahmed?

2. Is it possible for Mr. Ahmed to receive treatment and palliative care at the same time? If so, how would you describe this to Mr. and Mrs. Ahmed?

3. How could you use attentive listening and presence with this patient and his wife?

4. Role play the scene of how you would respond to Mr. Ahmed’s last statement. In addition, role play how you would describe palliative care to this family. Lastly, role play how you would elicit Mr. Ahmed’s end-of-life goals (see Figure 1: Exercise to Elicit End-of-Life Goals and Figure 2: Questions to Ask Patients and Families to Elicit End-of-Life Goals).